Re-read excerpts from the judgment on the Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case. Now, write in your own words what the judges meant when they said that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life.
Social StudiesClass 8CBSEAnswered 27 Mar 2026
Answer
Answer In the Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the judges stated that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life. They stated that life does not merely mean an animal’s existence; it cannot be lived without a means of livelihood. In the above-mentioned case, people were poor and lived in slums; they had small jobs and no other place to live. For them, eviction from their slum means deprivation of their livelihood, which consequently means deprivation of life. This is how judges connected the right to life to the basic requirements of any livelihood, i.e. Food, Clothes and shelter.
Suggested Q&A
Social Studies · Class 8- Social StudiesClass 8What was Birsa’s vision of a golden age? Why do you think such a vision appealed to the people of the region?
- Social StudiesClass 8What accounts for the anger of the tribals against the dikus?
- Social StudiesClass 8How did the powers of tribal chiefs change under colonial rule?
- Social StudiesClass 8What problems did shifting cultivators face under British rule?
- Social StudiesClass 8State whether true or false: (a) Jhum cultivators plough the land and sow seeds. (b) Cocoons were bought from the Santhals and sold by the traders at five times the purchase price. (c) Birsa urged his followers to purify themselves, give up drinking liquor and stop believing in witchcraft and sorcery. (d) The British wanted to preserve the tribal way of life.
- Social StudiesClass 8(a) The British described the tribal people as ____________. (b) The method of sowing seeds in jhum cultivation is known as ____________. (c) The tribal chiefs got ____________ titles in central India under the British land settlements. (d) Tribals went to work in the ____________ of Assam and the ____________ in Bihar.