“If history relies upon written records produced by city-based literati, nomadic societies will always receive a hostile representation.” Would you agree with this statement ? Does it explain the reason why Persian chronicles produced such inflated figures of casualties resulting from Mongol campaigns? (HOTS)
HistoryClass 11CBSEAnswered 27 Mar 2026
Answer
Answer:
Yes, I agree with the statement. I give the following reasons for my view.
- There were vast differences between The Secret Society of Mongols and Marco Polo’s Travelogues in terms of events and their descriptions.
- Being the transcontinental span of the Mongol empire, the sources were written in different languages.
- Persian chronicles produced inflated figures of casualties resulting from Mongol campaigns to prove their cruelty or to prove them as cruel assassins
Suggested Q&A
History · Class 11- HistoryClass 11Go through the chapter carefully and pick out some basic features of Roman society and economy which you think make it look quite modem.
- HistoryClass 11Suppose the emperor Trajan had actually managed to conquer India and the Romans had held on to the country for several centuries. In what ways do you think India might be different today?
- HistoryClass 11Why do you think the Roman government stopped coining in silver? And which metal did it begin to use for the production of coinage?
- HistoryClass 11Imagine that you are a Roman housewife preparing a shopping list for household requirements. What would be on the list?
- HistoryClass 11Compile a list of some of the towns, cities, rivers, seas and provinces mentioned in this chapter, and then try and find them on the maps. Can you say something about any three of the items in the list you have compiled?
- HistoryClass 11If you had lived in the Roman Empire, where would you rather have lived—in the towns or in the countryside? Explain why?